| Category |
Exemplary
4
|
Accomplished
3
|
Developing
2
|
Beginning
1
|
Score |
|
Content of research on endangered
species |
Covers topic in depth. Elaborates
throughout. Subject knowledge is evident (more than required) |
Includes essential information. Subject
knowledge is evident in much of the product. |
Fulfills minimal topic requirements.
Some subject knowledge is evident, but some is incorrect or confusing |
Subject knowledge is not evident.
Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed. |
|
|
Mechanics |
Presentation has no misspellings or
grammatical errors. |
Presentation has fewer than two misspellings
or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has three or more misspellings
or grammatical errors |
Presentation has four or more spelling
or grammatical errors. |
|
|
Oral
Presentation
|
Uses original approach effectively.
Highly organized. Well rehearsed. Ease in delivery. |
Interesting. Logical order. Fluid
delivery. Good use of delivery techniques. |
Clear and understandable. Uses appropriate
language. Uses limited delivery techniques. |
No logical sequence of events. No
evidence of delivery techniques. |
|
Mechanics
of PowerPoint |
Product shows highly effective use
of PowerPoint tools. |
Product shows effective use of PowerPoint
tools. |
Product is somewhat distracting and
/or limited by use of PowerPoint tools. |
Product is distracting and limited
by use of PowerPoint tools |
|
|
Teamwork |
The work load was divided and shared
equally by both team members. |
Both team members contributed their
fair share of the work. |
Both team members participated in
some aspect of the work, but workloads varied. |
The work load was not divided equally
and one team member contributed more than his or her fair share. |
|